The Republic V

It seems science is appreciated when applied to verify facts, but not when the facts happen to be about God. I have in The Republic IV claimed that the Conscience Collective rests with those who are rationally independent of politics and have also reasoned the truth of human existence by drawing distinctions between the level of physical existence, social existence, and spiritual existence. In the Metaphysics of its dynamic, Evolution is discarded as the dynamic is not a linear development in transformations. Evolution only deals with the physical, but human existent covers the social and spiritual existent. Which means humans cannot completely transform from the physical to the social leaving his/her body behind like a butterfly. Instead, the social and the spirit are all present in the body as the person is fully aware and functional.

The organism is not isolated in functions but coordinated in dimensions to serve an objective purpose in the concrete organisation of society. This is true in the dynamic organisation that persons are not all born on the same day, and do not all think alike or do exactly the same thing at the same time. Young people are more physical and social while adults are political and rational. But because his/her survival depends upon material subsistence, the struggle for existence is mainly materialistic. And the power struggles of organising the means of survival become political power struggles.

Western Civilisation has sustained a Colonial Empire on the monopoly of controlling a people while enjoying their resources. The king, the rulers, aristocrats, the workers and slaves have all served a purpose in the organisation of the kingdom. A civilisation at that may have had a useful purpose in the dark old ages. And yet today it is still as dark and no different; Globalisation, Climate Change, Freemarketing, Surcharges on services, revenue collection from restricting your freedom and GST all serve to control a people while the few elites behind the government enjoy society's wealth. This political manipulation is increasingly apparent in religion as pure principles have come under constant attacks from atheists and break away religions alike.

Under such a complex dynamic, society needs to be checked. The rulers or those who own the means of survival also hold power over the mass. The governments and their politics serve the rulers, their masters. They apply rational expertise to creative a technical jungle in technology to disguise their selfish intentions. Now if these people are rational and free but yet their power and decisions are self serving, then they don't serve a purpose in the concrete organisation of society. The rulers and so-called democratic governments are outside society. That means society has to be a valid outcome in the maintenance of the quality of life irrespective of class membership. Society is thus an accumulation of objective values. If society holds the values of a civilisation, and the material organisation of the means of survival are manipulated by those outside society, then what does that mean for Western Civilisation? The rulers and governments are also excluded from the idea of the good life unless the good life is enjoying other people's wealth while they endure the burden of struggles for survival.

That leaves the workers and slaves from the power holders. What is holding the workers and slaves to struggle when knowing of the injustice? Are they really foolish to allow the governments and their masters' to continue with coercive exploitation? If there is no fear of the ruler then there would be a big number of law breakers locked up in prison. But the same can be said of those who are deprived access to the means of maintaining their survival. Most people in prisons are non European men, and the suicide rate is also led by non European men. Is there a common consensus of giving up without a bother because the rulers are too violent on the non –European workers and slaves? One certain reason why men survive is because of their love for their families. They will endure the mortifying standards in order to improve the means of maintaining the welfare of their families.

The awareness of a struggle is realised in their position in the organisation of society, their feelings are raised to influence legal and democratic representations for the better. The existing ruling regime tends to punish a lot of non-European men. The government or those voted in to represent a people change their affiliation with people in order to serve political masters instead. And that means there is no outlet for a relief of the workers and slaves, especially of the non-European male. And that means, Western Civilisation is on the slide as the technological jungle creates dark allies of society. I don't think the workers and slaves can afford a head on war against the elites but give it time Western Civilisation doesn't need help to sink in the slippery slide. Until it has totally destroyed itself that hopes for a new civilisation may emerge.

What is the meaning of life in a frustrated dynamic of physical deprivation that love must emerge but only to find a jungle in the human civilisation of technological development; man is forced to become redundant. The good life is finding that moment to be in touch with human reality in the middle of a jungle and a spiralling civilisation. A condition common with the current weather that what expected to be spring time have all the bloom wilted by an unexpected frost.

So, who are the new expected rulers of Afghanistan and parts of Africa? Who are the new heads of the break-away religion no longer bearing the Christ? The human attempt to fulfil the Word is a grave disposition of a costly kind.....

The Republic IV

The Republic III

I think we all know what the idea of the Media's self sanction and Freedom of Speech is about. We all know the Media's role in a strategic scheme of things, the generation of class relations and promotion of the means to support a predominant class. It makes a Mickey out of Liberalism principles. And then you have individuals of a mission pronouncing their god given right and laying out the law as if others are external aliens from another planet. When you wake up in the morning to a radio greeting of racial slurs and derogative degradation of your belief, then you know better than to leave the radio on all night. Make sure your email or website is secured against spam and email attacks. If that sounds familiar, welcome to the selected targets not of the state but of a political regime.

It is when a Liberal movement violates its own principles by exploiting a people directly that it has departed from a classic struggle to assume a socialist role. Liberal socialist regimes legislate against freedom and exploit a people for profit. This is prominent with the exploitation of the family and gender struggles. The ailments and suffering of a people are organised to support an elite group usually a professional class. Funds are redirected from the subjects to pay for a socialist service upholding a commercial industry, and necessarily elevating a group of people from their current standing to improve their lifestyles.

I have earlier attempted to distinguish Social Liberalism from Socialist Liberalism in an analysis of Marx's Social Relations. Marx analysis like that of material science is an account of the outcome of material behaviour. If you have been following my study, you would be familiar with the analysis based on validating a moral philosophy. Socialist is a subjective term relating to self, the needs of the individual or his/her group is greater than the needs of others or of society. Socialist Liberalism therefore tends to assert the right of the individual or his/her group over the rights of others or of society. Thus, Socialist Liberalism is subjective, and Social Liberalism is objective. The former is fraud with dogmatic ideologies ruling absurd arbitration supporting the assertion of the rights of the ruler over the rights of the ruled.

The Western forefathers are cleared on the principles of Liberalism, but their modern followers have risked these principles for the demanding consequences exemplified in social and economic disasters. Marx's Social Relations refers to the material nature of capitalism, but I have advanced this by placing a filter in the social relations to objectify behaviour for a more stable and concrete outcome on society. Social Relations therefore according to me is not a material concept but an objective outcome from the subjective material aspects. That is adding values to make meanings of why we do the things we do unlike other creatures.

Obviously, Social Relations seek to sanction the individual in the interest of society by validating social policies and law and by proposing to make those law makers accountable and responsible for the social consequences of their action. That is exactly what Liberalism stands for; to sanction freedom by the responsibility, a check and balance against the social consequences.

There is a general measure of unintended consequences over the intended consequences to suggest the policy is absurd and the law maker must make good of the outcome. There is also the measure of freedom with regards to the age of reason, and induced psychosis among other circumstances.

And perhaps the most controversial outcome of Socialist Liberalism is the imposition of power in a blinded sort of way. For example, when the PM regulates teachers to adopt his idea of teaching over traditional standards, or to instruct lawyers how to read the law, is like an authoritative parent supervising his children. I think children would die not to be told in front of their friends, as it any wonder the people are beginning to answer back to their father! How embarrassing....

The measure of policies must always have a mechanism for reversal and making good of the consequences if it has caused harm to a people. But Socialist Liberalism seems to take advantage of the adverse consequences to control a people, and thus the intended consequence is like the means justifies the end. The rich are getting richer, alcohol, drugs, and foods are on demand especially during the recession; the poor are getting poor as the socialist service industry is booming.

They say that by raising the lifestyles of the rich will trickle down also to raise the standard of the poor in proportion. But with having no valid checks and balances in place, the lifestyle of the rich is raised and the trickle effect is reverse to flow upward. While the poor person is carrying an ailment, his pain is a means for further revenues redirected from the hospital to pay for psychologists, GP, lawyers, social workers, and caregivers. Public hospitals have found themselves short of specialists as individuals opt for the luxury available at a professional specialised elite socialist class.

When the ist of Socialism is removed from Liberalism that the material self is checked against concrete developments in the stable organisation of the economy. It will remove that cultural element from selection of opportunities, and from polarised boundaries of class structure. In that Liberal Socialism can be achieved successfully by its Democratic principle of self rule, the governed, and the conscience collective. The natural social organisation of the economy transforms the state in a symbol of the will. Political will is the valid will of the nation that represents all its people and its many cultures in the natural organisation of their objective social relations, to achieve meaning and purpose of their existent. But this is like archaic in modern relations where the bold and destructive behaviour are the popular demands of economic productivity. Pure subjective material economic behaviour is now surfaced in virtual reality. Why ever is having an Avatar to relate a story about humans when humans themselves can do a better a job is not so much about the truth, but the subjective aspects that makes the material appealing in layers of twists and spins to the eye or should I say to the feelings and senses.

I still maintain that reality is not with the subjective milieu of material aspects, but the objective social relation the stable rock of foundation. Life is not just existing but a meaning that adds value to its quality.

The Republic II

Liberalism in its pure form is independent of belief and political force. Its nature rests on civil understanding that the individual can be trusted to make informed decisions to the outcome of social objective. It is a natural attribute not kept by adherence to a written law, obligations or expectations but by awareness of what ought to be the right thing to do. It is the awareness of that which is right shared among members of their organisation. It is Natural Law the self government of the state, the symbol of its national will. This is the authority of the people. The government and its figurehead; be it a PM or President are symbolic representations of the will of the people.

A group like a civil society or other informed rational organisations are independent. Their independent stand on principles usually aims to improve human standards and civil progress. But a dominant group in opposition owns 90 percent of society’s resources, uses it as a power monopoly. The worse kept secret is the fact that the symbolic representation of the people, the government clearly serves the interests of that elite class, the bourgeois society. Thus the government serves to impose economic decisions in the interests of business people and thus influenced the direction of social progress towards making a profit. There is doubt in the application of the term 'political will' when the government serves the interest of the elite minority and at the same time opposes the will of the people. Its economic agenda strategised society to hierarchical layers of economic status, but the political agenda often polarised the boundaries more by cultural membership than by economic status.

The power elite minority manipulates society's resources to produce a profit. The independent societies are sometimes forced to oblige in the face of majority democratic opinions. Under the force of power, Education no longer serves to maintain a civil standard to society, but becomes a means to an economic end. The institution aims to earn a profit while serving to establish the fundamentals of the social structure. It takes advantage of various subordinated groups available. This is the defining element of a strategy that determines the social outcome of both economic and political decisions. The economic outcome gives rise to a hierarchical economic structure; the political outcome stratifies the layers of the structure into cultural identities. And you don't have to be a rocket scientist to figure out that the ethnic minority groups make up the bottom layers of the social structure.

The Republic as it stands is not quite a Liberal movement anymore when the outcome is a class stratum of cultural identities. So long as class membership is identified by culture and birthright, the 'national will' shall remain a fragment of society and the good life is nothing more than a dream.

The government is now a true representative of the power elite minority serving to legislate against the freedom of liberal movements. And ironically an aspect originally rejected by Liberalism; the good life is now enjoyed by an aristocratic class - well, by a bourgeois society. So there goes the Republic and its good life!

There is that economic and political violation of Liberalism in the socialist extraction of profit. But at the same time, the economic strategy is impossible to produce a profitable outcome in extreme environment without the availability of civil societies and independent rational groups, but mostly without the availability of an underclass. This is because struggles without an outlet are rigid and susceptible to extreme breakouts, the reason why we should appreciate the existent of civil and rational societies, much to the disapproval of power monopoly.

There you have struggles at the top of the hierarchy and struggles at the bottom. In the latter, I have come across significant modern developments of economic and political impositions on cultural diversity. If you visit the local Supermarket, you may notice that the usual check-out-staff of students and Polynesian operators has been gradually replaced by adult Asians. And their service seems to reflect on the amount of your shopping; the larger the shopping the greater the smiles and helpfulness in packing your groceries away. It is debated that the service is determined by your cultural identity, and or your gender.

Too bad for the old folk and the bachelor who buys minimal and on occasions, he never gets a smile or a helping hand with the shopping bag. Incidentally, it may reinforce the role of women to pushing the shopping trolley in the aisle of super specialised consumerism.

Does the supermarket service with a smile and helpfulness encourage big spenders and what could that mean for the family? Or is the lack of service discourages others away from the super market and therefore save a bit more? Like the Supermarket, does The Warehouse tend to cater for the desires of its customers and reflect the goods available on the shelves? So if women are restricted to the Warehouse and the Supermarket, are we more exposed to feminine goods than not? But according to economic status, the size of your shopping does not necessarily reflect the size of your wallet, not in the final analysis anyway.

So when you have powerful elites manipulating former representatives of the people, target economic initiatives can have a pronounced effect on your neighbourhood. Alcohol outlets and social behaviour, cheap food and health habits, prostitution, services, gambling, addiction, violence and crime, poverty...all these developments can be checked by the availability of civil societies and rational independent groups.

The violation of Liberalism is like teaching grandma how to cook eggs, and you would appreciate why teachers and parents are rising against education reforms. The more laws that are imposed the less free we become in a consumerism society.

The Republic

According to the Online Wikipedia, Freedom is the value that precedes the validity of the individual, his society, and the state. Liberalism is the value that emphasises the importance of individual freedom with regards to equal rights, freedom of speech, and with respects to the freedom of the governed. In essence, 'Liberalism tolerates different beliefs and different ideas as to what constitutes a good life'. It is freedom from slavery and from force that individuals exercise their natural rights to interact in the activities of their society. It is the participation in the activities of their society that establishes the basis of their social contracts and national will.

The historical account of Liberalism captures a civilisation in progress, displaying legends of established Western thinkers of time. The forefathers of the West have agreed in principle that freedom is the cornerstone that upholds the organisation of society. The individual and his/her inalienable rights form the basis of social organisation, upon which merits the authority to govern and naturally giving rise to the state. The success and fulfilment of the individual's rights is the maintenance of society the enjoyment of the 'good life'. It is the moral basis of social organisation the stabilising force of the economy.

(I have interpreted unhindered Nature as moral and valid following from the objective form producing a concrete outcome. Thus Freedom as a value is objective because it is self sanctioned, that is; the violation of someone else's freedom subject your own freedom to another's violation. Because one wouldn't wish his/her freedom to be violated that he/she would not violate another's freedom. The maintenance of freedom is checked by the awareness of the consequences. And freedom is thus valid in the informed and rational existent of social being; the collectivity of which forms society).

These magnificent leaders have been guardians of the spirit since Western time. Freedom is a value: a value consisting of equal rights, free speech, respects of belief, and tolerance of differences. These are the basis of authority; a group of individuals' rights, the governed. A value is a principle or valid entity, the practice of which binds individuals in a group. Here's the crucial part; individuals are aware of the principle binding their group, and by following the principle are thus governed. They are self governed or autonomous. The collective awareness of the governed forms the basis of the state, a symbol of the national will. The government is established upon the authority of the governed to protect the individual; hence promote his/her activities and social relations to support their good life. The good life is the awareness of values upholding the individuals' rights, the collectivity of which forms society. The collective of governed individuals or the conscious collective is a group of enlightened individuals maintaining the principles and values of society. They are not obliged or set out as a rule to oversee principles, but are naturally aware of what ought to be the right thing to do. The individual is the basic unit of society; society looks after itself by protecting the individual's rights.

(The government has a fundamental duty to maintain itself by ensuring the protection of the rights of its individual members).

The validity of freedom is based on the practice of values; equal rights, freedom of speech, respect of belief, tolerance of difference, free from force, right to property, right to participate in social, political, and economic activities, and to enjoy the basic means of sustaining a reasonable quality of life, etc. When some folks' rights are more equal or more important and special than others; or their freedom of speech is choked, or their belief is disrespected, or are excluded from social, political, and economic participation, that their freedom is violated. The self sanctioned nature of freedom follows destruction, that if you should violate someone else's freedom that your own freedom is subjected to be violated. It is your disrespect of other people's belief that your own is opened for others to attack. And it is the defence of freedom that has drawn military arms and conflicts between cultures and between nations.

It is because the governed or the collective conscience - the spirit or the national will is invalid and disproportionate. I have placed the collective conscience as the valid form or pure spirit, as the conscious collective is a political rule based on economic and partisan sentiment. It is the violation of freedom that the enjoyment of the good life; the stability of social organisation and economic participation is unequalled, disrespected, choked, excluded and destabilised.

It is the government's role to protect the freedom of the individual. It is when inalienable individual rights are valid that the state has achieved its national will. It is when freedom is validated by the practice of its principles that it achieves the good life the enjoyment of balanced social relations of the economy. It is unlikely that the national will of a sovereign state shall emerge when individuals are categorised into cubic holes of culture deprived from resources and excluded from activities of society. If so then the many cultures of society are stratified by class status as the state fragments into power cells of political representation.

So, obviously a compatible Electoral System is necessary to reflect the existing cultures of society. A First Past the Post system is incompatible with the multicultural set up. A Mixed Member Proportion system has been manipulated by strategic and tactical voting that its true outcome has been manipulated to reflect the majority vote. Ethnic minority group representatives become token reps when in compliance with a party line in favour of the predominant majority, while at the same time the pressing issues of their own constituencies are either ignored or be taken advantage of.

The status quo has to be relaxed in favour of ability and skills as opposed to cultural advantage. This is demonstrated by the selection of sports for example; the NZ 7s share a good mix of skills and culture reflected by a natural following of a uniting mix. In other areas, Maori and Pacific peoples are over represented in Welfare queues, in prison, and in health care.

A national will may not surface in the absence of the good life while social boundaries are stratified by cultural codes. The tension upholding stratifications may strain in the conditions until diverse entities are in tune with principles of freedom. And this is possible because the governed, the good life, the conscience collective, or society is only validating rational and responsible entities. A Republic has a fundamental moral responsibility by those responsible for decisions in social policies, and law. It is freedom that precedes happiness in the social organisation which stabilises the economy. The violation of freedoms is a bad reflection on decision makers...

Men Suicide

Across the Pacific, the highest paid professional in the world is certainly not happy right now, while in New Zealand the business woman of the year is a professional prostitute. There you go; money can't satisfy love but while sex is rewarded, love can’t be bought. Is sex incompatible with love begs the question; but both can't be true at the same time in our modern brave world.

Social relations of the economy are much more complex in relative existent where pointers may in fact indicate a movement in contrary. A traditional economic trend expects obesity to relate with the well off side of the street, but it turns out that as the economy enjoys boom time, the poor gets fat from eating a lot of cheap food lacking in nutrition.

The following is a regional released of men suicide rate by Stuff News; 30 Dec 2009.

Male suicide rate per 100,000 population, 2002-2006;

The reflection of the above table in terms of economic growth at about 2004 – 2008 period places Taranaki at the top of the scale, followed by West Coast and Northland. Southland is sixth from the bottom at about 3.9 % growth. It suggests suicide as common in areas of rapid growth associated with risk. There was a huge economic downturn at about 2004 contrasts to rapid growth immediately after. This unnamed Bank Economic rating calculates financial costs and interest rates along with property and export as production per population. Other productive activities including vehicle trades and sales or consumers are not rated.

By population comparison in the likely background to suicide, Auckland has the lowest rate in the most multicultural setting and the highest population in the country. If therefore the high risk is compensated by the availability of a large consumer population then it is not the high end of business that's falling to suicide but the consumer who is burdened by the financial costs.

The high risk business sector has a safety net in the availability of a consumer population but in the lack of which the suicide rate is higher. This strongly supports the availability of a population a safety factor in the fundamentals of economic growth.

Rapid growths may account for high interest rates and inflation at the expense of redundancies and poor working conditions. All material aspects are related to the social organisation of the economy because man has nothing else to do other than seeking to fulfil his/her material desires. That is why when individuals fail to meet their desires that depression settles in. It would obviously affect the individual heavily if he/she is isolated.

The reason why men don't achieve the means of fulfilling their desires may be due to financial circumstances resulting with relationship break ups and suicide, but I don't believe the economy is particularly targeting gay persons or their relationships. Men and women alike all share the same economic struggles. It is how they deal with their struggles that make a difference in the outcome. I have suggested purifying material aspects by the practice of principle values and thus turning material desires into objective social relations for those who believe and are overwhelmed by the economic static force. But why should non believers follow those principles if they don't believe? And since they are non believers, they are responsible for their own prerogative predicament.

It is the trouble with arbitrary rights which are incompatible with transcending principles of being. Forgiveness is genuine letting God be God and not taking the law into your own hands or paying back wrong for wrong. Believe me blaming someone else for your own making will only add stress on yourself. No it's not karma, it is selfishness....

The Social Dimension

What is right and accepted as normal remains natural, but material development has gradually progressed away from solid reality to its subjective material element. It has in fact split the dimension to exist in a linear subjectivity.

The process follows:

material/body -> social -> spiritual/wellbeing

Objective: injury -> pain -> healing/healthy

Subjective: injury ->pain-> infection/sick

I have considered the Objective to be natural and right for it promotes and advances life. While the Subjective may be considered natural, it is external development. The material subjective development may promote life to advance in the material but is still linear and remains on the physical dimension.

Healing restores the body to health which in turn enables the person to fulfil his/her objective function towards the common good. While nobody wishes to end up with an infection, it is nonetheless real. But it is expected of someone who has maintained natural healthy habits of nourishment to heal, than someone who hasn't. Someone who has maintained a healthy lifestyle both physically and mentally is inherently objective, and the opposite is true of someone who hasn't to be inherently subjective. Both developments overtime would result with the establishment of a respective gene and it is then where we assert that material developments has gradually progressed from what used to be right - maintaining a healthy lifestyle to its material subjectivity of indulging in an unhealthy lifestyle.

Many researchers have concluded that young and attractive are preferred when making employment selections over experienced and the aged. This line of thinking is confirmed by the way products are promoted to appeal attractive. While it's nonetheless natural, the material development of the social aspect is promoted by the senses, by the emotions, and when tastes and addictions are established, desires. The material subjective development is nourished by commercial promotion of production in the environment and reinforced by peer pressure. When established, the individual is either addicted or has inherited a desire for certain tastes and likes. It is possible that someone who is physically attractive may carry an addiction, but nonetheless preferred as an employee.

It is also supported that those who are easy on the eye gets lenient treatments in court than those that are not. Again we look at how this decision is developed from the senses and taken as reality in justice as the right thing to do!

The availability of technology and its bioengineering has further advanced the material subjective progression away from stable and objective existent. In the middle ground of the second dimension is the mass existent of social aspects with potentials to establish permanency. Most of this development is collected from the physical environment and formed in patterns or addictions and desires, while the mind process to modify the same aspects in the formation of objective entities. And this is the process of principle values and the function of the a priori principle. The outcome of the struggle between the a priori and the environment impact on the lifestyle of the individual. A healthy mind and a healthy body, a subjective material is maintained by addictions and desires. Like the material subjectivity gene, the objective gene can also be developed overtime. And the differences provide the proof of unequal existent of genetic duplication from genetic creation.

The material progress has in fact cloned humanity overtime to reverse progress from stable and objective nature to uncertain existent of material subjectivity. Because it's a lot easier to make money by dumping anything on the counter without adherence to any social obligation or consequences and the future, is reinforced by the fact that the consumers are expected to be driven by their addictions and desires rather than by objective principles.

So, what used to be right was natural and normal across universal expectations, has changed to preferences determined by the eye (of the beholder). In the first dimension we have a material development, the second dimension we have a social aspect, and the outputs either a subjective outcome in the dependent unhealthy social class of consumers or objective outcome in the health and wellbeing of society. Notice in here the subjective outcome remains in the material plane, but the objective outcome transcends a dimension.

The world is not going to end in a hundred years therefore it's not too late to adjust to stable existent. It is the right of those who come after us to their existent and we owe it to them. It is not the linear material subjectivity, but the whole realm of existent in its natural dimensions.

This is obviously considered too complext to be knowable and expect an alarming reaction from professionals among preachers! But the point is, if I was seen as attractive and one among their kind, the topic raised in here would be as sweet as music to their ears. Otherwise, they are perfect subjects of the material kind. If in doubt, do the research and you will prove what is happening now...

It is in this stage of Capitalism where the material has taken over the human and obviously the human has to wake up and get back to life or slip sliding away in the spiral...

THE MORAL OF SOCIETY

After hearing a preacher on social issues, I'm beginning to see where the Liberal movement gets its ideological support from. This refers to the rights of the person whether one is 10 or 40 years old that he/she is free to do anything one chooses like anyone else. There you go, I was concerned about the influence of modern religion on education and social policy and their general impact on society especially upon the growing-up generations.

I have written the basis of my Moral Philosophy a few years ago when I started my blog. It is a process of analysis the social issues according to Plato, Kant, Marx, and St. Paul. It is a process of analysing the physics to reach the metaphysics or adding value to the pure body in order to make it a human, from the material to the social being and spirit.

The person is formed according to Plato before birth. From that moment onwards, his/her total life is depended on parents, guardians, peers, and society. The values sanctioning and protecting that person's existent is held by society. I don't think a person in that form is able to choose for oneself whether to be born or not, and like the 14 year old he/she is totally depended on society for survival. You see, the person is already a person before birth. But being a person does not equal to moral freedom.

Freedom is measured on two layers: one of material; and the other of social or spiritual. Material freedom concerns with pleasure and power, Social or spiritual freedom concerns with responsibility. The 14 year old is free to explore, to discover and to learn under the watchful eye of responsible guardians or parents and society. Material freedom is determined by feelings and senses and influenced from the pressures of the environment. Since you the person are not totally free to choose your action, then your freedom is not really valid until you become responsible. It is then that you are validly free when you are responsible for the consequences of your action. How many 14 year olds who are totally independent and responsible? Being a person does not make you morally responsible or totally free. Details of material freedom explain the age of reason and induced psychosis.

Now, both Kant and Rand reason the material to independence and purity. But the consequence of the pure material is lacking the aspects of culture and the social environment. The pure material deteriorates into nothingness, starves itself to death. You see, the person on his/her own material body cannot survive. His/her survival depends on the ability to adapt to the environment and his/her relations with the natural inhabitants. Artificial intelligence is not enough to sustain your humanity alone. And that is why Marx attempted to make something productive of your material person, and St. Paul to free you from the destructive nature of your same material person. We have now elevated from the material restriction of the self construct to the social and spiritual values of your being. And I doubt if a 14 year old is able to comprehend that. It has expands the boundaries of pure or artificial intelligence to include culture and the arts.

St. Paul refers to freedom of the spirit as innocent to the law and not obliged to expectations. Intuition is thus having hindsight of experience of the physical world purified the objective being. It is this freedom of being that gives rise to the conscience awareness that gathers the collective consensus. You see, it is not a collective of ideas or legal agreement, but rather knowing and doing what is commonly accepted as right. It is having learned from physical experienced collected by the great five senses and purified by objective principles. We know and understand the nature of our material humanity and are guarded by the awareness of our being. The act of intuition and the collective conscience is pure. Society in this level is pure. It is the spirit of society.

Society as we know it is the collective of conscious awareness; those who know what's right from wrong are motivated to do the right thing. The trouble with this social organisation is that its goal is self serving. Society being closed to a particular culture or predominant race applies arbitrary laws to achieve its collective purpose. It is usually discriminative of other ethnicities. And this can't be pure.

So society in the spirit is the extraction of the social to emerge a pure being. Pure being is still a person, but a super responsible person. Relationships are likely to be universal in the newest and elevated discovery of existent. I have raised the idea in the likely relation between faith and intelligence that has to be objectively progressive for both seek to advance life physically and spiritually. You cannot go wrong if all the destructive nature of material science are removed and safeguarded by natural moral law...

The person has a chance to develop and naturalise one's physical attributes, a chance to discover his/her true nature in social existent, and a chance to purify his/her spirit. The person's material body requires food for nourishment; the social awareness indulges in politics, in the arts and culture, and the spirit in the principles of being.

NOTE: *Objectivism can only sanction moral law serving a human function. It is the human function that merits it value. A value is not a freedom to destroy or violate, especially when valid freedom is self sanctioned. For example, you cannot violate another person;s freedom if it meant he/she would only violate your freedom in return. You see, objectivism cannot be a legal entity if freedom cannot serve universal useful purpose and not a destructive one. It is the same with artificial intelligence or pure reason. Objectivism without freedom is not an entity and any moral values based on objectivism are therefore invalidated.

GOOD vs EVIL

I am not an expert on the field of DNA, but it shouldn't be a barrier for investigation of its human progress. It is said that once the DNA sequence is altered, the RNA message is changed and its natural intention is lost. How then can mutations, freaks of nature, accidents, genetic engineering or biotechnological engineering produce a valid outcome? Its logical structure cannot add.

If mutation is the result of a defective or invalid process, then it's obviously doubtful and you cannot justify evolution, or natural selection, or science in that logic. If this isn't playing dice, then I don't know what is. The physical development is not progression but rather deterioration. The engineers are involved in the process of creation by selecting favourable sequence to order desired mutations. It is not a natural process producing an objective outcome by any sense of the word. Mutation therefore is a subjective term; its outcome is a deviation from the stem of nature. Its manmade manipulation cannot be justified as an objective development. But this raises a serious concern on how extremely forceful these scientists are and their doubtful claims.

I remember writing an essay about this struggle a few years ago, that the antithesis of genetic developments is its objective counterpart, founded on Social development. Genetic entities cannot make sense or distinguish itself from other creatures on its own when scientists are manipulating the cause of accidents to produce their existence. Its objective purpose therefore can only be reflected in a natural design, but unlike the genetic accidents which develop from the ground up, the social objective is founded upon a priori. So in the absence of Frankenstein, genetic mutations can be corrected by the maintenance of principles in the environment.

And it follows from the original claim of creation that is not manipulated by man, but by the practice of principles passed down the generations. The genetic development involves the manipulation of the social environment, reinforcing the domination of the ID by the self construct. The gene is sustained by the produce of desires and addiction, influenced by the control of the self construct. You see, it makes sense that all these contaminations are from proteins found in the food chain of an environment that we live in long periods of time. It also explains the presence of contaminated genes in a group exposed to poverty conditions for a time.

The practice of principles for a long period of time adjusts the behaviour to survive in a given environment. Its DNA order conforms to a natural process in agreement with its natural development to withstand contamination and possible mutations. While changes may not be readily visible in the physical condition, the mind is however advanced to determine behaviour until its natural state is achieved, the state of intuition. Since the threat of contaminated proteins is a development over time, its counter objective also develops overtime; the time being the life of the defective gene until its termination and replacement. If the social objective is a natural determinant of behaviour as in the a priori and its intuitive state, then the likely chance of mutation is remote.

But all these contaminants are material developments influenced by the self construct as behaviour is influenced by material desires. And all these bio developments can be corrected and balanced to their natural order and to stabilise the mode of sustaining the material means of our survival.

Mutation is a subjective development either caused by a defective order, or manmade manipulation. Its objective counterpart is the natural order of human progress, the a priori. And now you know why Materialist science insists on teaching Evolution at the expense of Intelligent Design because the genetic order created by man is the means by which he maintains his dominion over nature, giving rise to his power and glory. He is seated in the throne of the temple as he rules over the Material State of his repressive world order. It is a world characteristic of psychological and coercive control of the population to achieve maximum profit.

And thereby rests the danger of destruction; if not by some forceful mutation, then it's by the lack of the a priori in social objective of material development.

SOCIAL RELATIONS

The aspects of our material existence are anything from our action to how we feel and our dreams. It can be an emotional reaction to a stimulant, or a craving to fulfill a desire or an addiction. The motives influencing our material aspects are selfish and ambitious, normally to fulfil our own egoes. All these aspects are related to the material influenc of our environment which is feeding and shaping our egos.

However, all these material aspects of our existence are subjected to a check of reality. The method is designed by Descartes that our memory is not reliable to be trusted, and for all we know we could be motivated by dream experience rather than true reality. But that doesn't stop material aspects from occurring in real life, only that when we act accordingly, we are therefore deceived.

The above I will term material aspects. It is when those material aspects are objectified, or validated logically that there outcome produce Social Relations. Social Relations therefore are the valid aspects of our existence. These aspects hold solid values contributed to the organisation of society. These are values binding our behaviour in the formation of social groups. We are not dreaming in our participation in the activities of society, we are instead quantifying the principles or social values making up the fabric of our society.

Society is thus the accumulation of social reality. So if our reality is the accumulation of valid aspects of our existence, then society is upheld by the objective values that organise the order of our existence. We may exist in the material body, but our reality transcends the body into being. We as human beings engage in social relations that maintain the collective of our society. Society is thus the collectivity of valid aspects, the values that quantify its organisation.

There are political groups motivated by ideological followings, but political groups by nature exercise arbitrary authority to execute its hedonistic and hegemonic power. It is not a valid exercise but one considered under the aspects of material force or Material Freedom. Its subjective nature is synonymous with Conservative ideology, but recently spearheaded the Liberal movement on its socialist development. It is characteristic of a conflict of interest between the individual's material freedom and the moral rule of society. It is Subjectivity vs Objectivity as witnessed in modern trends the rise of individualism and its material behaviour against traditional establishment of society.

In its basic elements, Freedom is validated by the responsibility with the exception of preconditions such as the age of reason, induced psychosis or illness. Logic not only purifies the body, but also strips the human aspects down to nothingness. We are not able to survive physically at this nothingness stage, but the opportunity prepares our self for transformation into being. It is the process of purification of material aspects or the self and body in the establishment of objective principles responsible for the maintenance of being and our human societies.

It is suggested in the Bible that a process of purification requires fasting of the physical condition and meditation on principles. I can tell you that it's probably not ideal to prepare one's mind for such devotion in a flash hotel, or thinking about its luxuries and their desires. I have found that being in a state similar to sorrow and suffering (not coerced) distant oneself from material aspects to be in a neutral mood and clear mind. It doesn't suggest that one must physically suffer or deprived in order to achieve an ideal state but the absence of material influence can help prepare one's mind and spirit. The practise of faith or principles of belief is a lifetime particiaption however, and not an overnight thing.