Religion is the Only Hope Now
The failure of globalisation to achieve solidarity among citizens may give valid reason to two progressive developments: one; the failure of private corporations and multinationals to generate work and wealth in a fair distributive manner is added to the cost of living by maintaining debts and deficits which fuels anti globalisation protests requiring a forceful measure of social organisation, and two; the majority of opposing citizens may promote a ruling regime away from globalisation in order to resume ownership and control of their own local affairs. The former may witness the rise of Fascism, the latter is a movement away from Globalisation to Localisation.
There are interesting social developments if the latter should effect like the end of IMF and international bodies and or rule by non-governmental democratic bodies. And this is where I differ from Marx, as his Socialism is secular materialism which has doubt over the validation of the point of status and standings realisation. Instead My Social Relations has successfully validated the conscience collective to enhance the cause of human Evolution.
Like there is enough food to feed the world, we also have enough money to exchange for the means of our needs and survival. The trouble is the same, the organisation of which continues to overthrow the balance in favour of the few and at the expense of the majority.
If you have a hierarchical tax system aiming to be fair, but at the same time only few jobs are available, then the tax system would be useless. Then the only businesses available are private corporations and multinationals which pay minimal tax while exporting not only local goods but also profit. Soon, the local economy is sucked dry. And we keep on borrowing as ratings come down to increase interests and harsher reformations, enough to raise the dead from cobwebs of the graveyard. Materialism has arrived at creating a profit from nothing and there is no value in return. There is proof right now everywhere you see that the most economic and profitable enterprise has failed to sustain the living, not even the highest accumulation of so-called private wealth.
It is not food or money that is lacking, but rather the system of organisation to keep in check with the behaviour of modern human. The means including human resources for the achievement of major productivities for profit have exceeded their purpose. Profit is the ultimate goal and labour is sacrificed to make a profit. The human resource has thinned out that portion of the brain to consider the consequences. The politicians cannot see the same human values he/she holds for his/her own among others. As long as profit is made, it doesn't matter how many are laid off, or have died in the cause of their achievement. Because that portion of the brain is thinned or stripped, it doesn't remember that a labour spends his/her wages to buy the product. The place of purchase of the product is the market. And when labour is sacrificed, or become unemployed, or dead that there is no market. But the robotic machine continues to create artificial wealth from lineal production more than anyone could need in a lifetime, and yet the population is starved and social organisation on the uprising.
It has taken years of destabilisation by the promotion of secular materialism at the expense of principle values. The rise of secular materialism is associated with so-called modern progress. Lacking in any objective developments, Modernity seems to embody a New Age group who promote same sex unions and homosexual freedom. They have access to both the media and political influence to mount the persecution of Religion. They claim their case on behavioural aspects that are personal to individuals and are largely subjective against Catholicism, as they persecute Christianity in the Middle East, in Europe, and in the West. When they pulled down religious statutes and symbols from courts, classrooms, and public houses, they were not promoting a sector of humanity; they were in fact detaching the values that bound the material structure of their objective existent. They began to thin themselves down to the pure material in the Nothingness.
I have said that there are two occupants of the Nothingness; one is a subjective entity, and the other is being. It goes back to the structure of ID and the conflict between subjective materialism (self) and objective being (principle). Christianity upholds the balance in the stability of humanity without which the material entity is caught in a spiral of self deterioration.
Capitalists may achieve as much wealth under secular materialism, but accumulation of their stuff has failed to make ends meet for the rest of the world. And that is why human civilisation cannot progress without religion. It is innate of our make-up that only surface in our time of most need. Notice it is the time that we are not possessed by such material attachments that our true beings emerge!
I was referring to a case of a single parent family that were issued a notice to remove their dogs or move out. Her case is a classic appeal to the emotions when seeing children with their little dog. When the landlord forcefully takes the dog away, you can imagine a public upheaval... But the mother had been informed of the decision for quite some time now, but she didn't do anything about it until the latest notice. In fact, the landlord had offered to help find a suitable place for the dogs simply because dogs are not always appropriate in public social housing but to no avail.
Now the mother has to measure the fact that she cannot afford private housing paying market rent, and her children will end up on the street with or without the dog. But in here, she herself is angry and upset about the decision that she is emotionally stuck.
That is what some people believe if there was a god, then she should be allowed to keep her dog. And at the same time, the same people believe that God should look after her for the dogs and make the landlord keep the dogs. Hello..!
Rationally, maintaining her home with her children is priority and suggests she should find an alternative home for the dogs. Emotions are natural and cannot be avoided but if we don't rule over it, we end up in a bigger mess than we already are. And without principle values of ID that is inherent of religion such as Catholicism, we might not be able to sustain a stable balanced life.
And that is the portion that has been thinned by the mass indoctrination of secular materialism, leaving individuals to become helpless... There is an objective lesson for her in here, and it's not my job to tell her what to do. Rather she has the freedom to choose for herself. That portion which balances her decision making her feel ok about it and not totally overwhelmed by an aspect is missing. And without religion, we in the future would be heading down this way far..