Why the Local Electoral System is Critical to Global Stability
When Christianity attempts to intervene for the sake of disadvantaged and deprived citizens, capitalists among conservatives enforce the separation of the state and religion. When the economic social consequences accumulate, capitalists blame religion not only for not intervening, but also for having money. It is in the same frame as how monetary values have stripped their sovereign objectives to reflect material and technological progress that have disestablished labour force and the structure of the market. Hello world, as if you need reminding, we are deep in a mire of debts. I hope you had a look at my article on 'How to be a successful scapegoat'. Anyway, welcome to the Modern!
The shortfall of one party government continues to place obstacles in future developments. A government in office can not only leave behind a massive debt but there's nothing stopping the incumbent from legislation against social and economic policies of the incoming government. This has seen governments in office to have by-passed debates on some bills while others are fast forward.
National's policy of direct funding of the private sector has failed to produce any headway for New Zealand. It has created a series of debt deficits to affect the cost of living but their social consequences are destined to be inherited by the incoming government.
A minority partner of the government traded its support for its 'law and order policy' that strengthens the boundaries of the 1% from the 99%, but this time polarised by cultural identification. The same time National embarked on a law reform strategy as if the economy depended on it, but only to increase the gap between the rich and poor who are now polarised by culture. The government's alliance seems to be vested in elsewhere where law reforms are to smooth the way before its master enters the kingdom. It's paving the way for multinationals to more or less take over local affairs. These were laws made to allow for mining and deep sea mining as well as multinational authority over locals on certain trade legislations.
Well, we the ordinary citizens have lost our fundamental rights to a claim as in natural circumstances of self defense, and duties to do the right thing. For some of us we no longer have the right to a trial by jury and the law can decide our fate in our absence. Legal aid is also only available for some based on income. Basically, suspects are guilty before proven innocent and that means the law can act on treating suspects as if they are guilty, while the suspect is now imposed with the burden of proof. Because we no longer have basic rights to natural justice, our segregation is legislated polarisation by economic standings and social status.
Like direct funding of multinational projects and their private corporation projects paid for by the tax payer, criminals are now legislated to pay a fund to support the lifestyles of those infallible; the ones who blame suspects on the basis of economic and social status. And this gives rise to the permanent basis of an underclass maintained by legal precedence.
There is little between the two major parties, they are both dominated by the same culture and similar politics. The only distinction is their ideological beliefs but that has adjusted to accommodate the global culture of multinationals and has thus redirected their target away from a local sovereignty to a multinational centralisation entity. You have all these individual nations connecting into the centre of globalisation, but they don't have a standard or common value of bind. Each nation is as radical or dominant as ever as their sovereignties are miles apart. The discrepancy is a perfect smokescreen for flexible multinational corporations to take advantage of. These multinationals presume low costs of labour in third world standards but take advantage of maximum gain of capital and profit typical of advanced nations.
When citizens attempt to protest as we speak in light of Occupation of Wall Street, our rights are no longer effective as individuals are criminalised and dragged away. Technology had stripped the fabric of society and replaced it with the vinyl of the mechanic; humans have not only lost their trading values but the family began to disestablish. Labour force became units of consumers forming the basis of a socialist economy. We have become the slaves of the machine, but here we are sinking in the mire of it.
As long as there is no common bind in sovereign trades and exchanges ie; a value that contributes to the social stability of different organisations, the failed structure is the paradise for multinationals and private corporations. Multinationals are suited to the complex because of their flexible nature to belong to a class of poor producers at the one end, and an elite member of the advanced nations maximising capital and prices at the other end. But sovereign values remain rigid as radicals and conservative sectors distort local organisation. And this provides for a perfect cloak for multinationals and private corporations to operate under the obscured radar of public awareness.
If we should think that multinationals are on a good thing taking advantage of a loophole, then we are merely reinforcing bad behaviour responsible for economic downturns. If you think inequalities is good for initiatives therefore progress, then you must take another look if you can that the social consequences have accumulated enough casualties to better the toll of world wars put together - unless of course, one is so linear he/she cannot see the whole picture.
One sector of Greece opposes reforms; the other sector is in favour, keeping the whole organisation distracted. Its sovereign has second thoughts about a shared value with the Euro. The sovereign is detached from the machine as labour force is made redundant and society disestablished; the business and private sector assumes a foreign god in globalisation.
The IMF clearly serves the interests of the global multinational. The sovereign is thinned of objective values becomes a monetary aspect of the private sector. The social sector is detached from the material accumulates social consequences. A devalued monetary aspect is added social consequences become too heavy for a linear global structure. Deprived of labour that sustains the market and sovereign values that stabilise the monetary aspect, the pure linear material cannot sustain a stable organisation by itself!
The global centre cannot be stabilised by complex inputs of one party governments of local organisation. This is guaranteed to promote uncertainties and volatile developments in successive periods of government terms of office. Their global input is always changing to upset any global developments. The sovereign status of local nations is detached of objective values by linear representation of one-party governments. One-party governments can only uphold a linear aspect of their ideological projections; it's either a linear material detached of objective values, or objective values without a body. It has never been both.
Since pure linear material fails to uphold a solid organisation, mountains of monetary accumulations without social objectives have failed to stabilise societies and has drawn nations into war in the destruction of our world. Movements are significant in the transfer of wealth and resources from the public sector to individuals and to the private sector in periods of time to mark major upheavals of time.
The local electorate system has to impact a good proportion of multi representatives away from ideological representation of culture and economic sectors of society. Labour and national for example can complete a more holistic representation of organisation, but the current electorate system separates it into linear developments. And this has led all the way to the making of global uncertainty.