FOREVER IN YOUR DEBTS
Sarcasm is not appropriate in matters of colossal concerns, but you know it is still better to see the funny sight of it than being a failure forever.
Why drag a dead horse when we can all cut our losses is self explanatory really, but I don't think anyone was thinking about dragging climate change to try and save the world while powerful nations don't give an inch. In fact, climate change and its ETS prompt a vehicle for a free ride instead. Capitalists among the rich continue to destroy the world by mining earth's crust and by heating the environment, and yet the price of petrol and oil continue to rise. They continue to prop Capitalism from tipping over when wealth accumulations in the private sector have reached the sky. At the same time, the majority of citizens live below the poverty line.
Technology has nourished the power of the wind and the sun to produce energy. This natural energy is environmentally friendly which would counter climate change effects to make up for any short fall. With natural energy in endless supply, there is no need for nuclear power and for nuclear arms when natural energy can do the job ten times more sufficient and ten times less expensive for those who so desire. Electromagnetic waves and fracking can design to order disasters of your choice as weapons of tectonic warfare are available at the inevitable destruction of our planet.
At the same time, oil is costing more to produce and provides a guarantee for profit whether artificial or not. But the capitalists and their rich private sector own most of the world's wealth and yet they continue to destroy earth as if they can't afford a decent meal. It has to be more than just profit.
Capitalism is exploitation of workers among consumers to make a profit. It makes a difference with 'exploitation' when the meaning of profit is shared by both the capitalist and the worker or consumer alike. The capitalist has to have a worker and consumer to exploit and subdued by means of struggles and inequalities in order to make and share profit. And we're not talking about tying one of the worker's hands behind his/her back allowing only one hand free for work!
We are talking about a partnership between the private business sector and the public sector the relationship between the capitalist and the worker/consumer. The capitalist and the worker consumer have unequal roles and their relationship is maintained by 'valid' struggles. (Valid refers to objective social relations as opposed to material subjective aspects). The partnership between the private business sector and public sector is maintained by the availability of their shared market. The maintenance of the market is participation in struggles of unequal functions (and not destruction). Their participation in trades and exchanges of uneven and unequal functions produces a product of which they both share the profit.
You cannot have the private business sector struggling against itself, it only accumulates useless wealth. Likewise, it's probably difficult for the public sector, or labour and consumer to struggle against itself either, but only accumulates unemployment in an oversupply market. Capitalism therefore is not a linear function of an isolated sector but an inseparable struggle of opposite and unequal parts in function. It is the organisation of the economy the organisation of society not destabilisation of the working class or their families. And this is stabilised by having one absolute strand connecting everything from nothingness to material aspect and to human being and beyond.
The ambitious individual capitalist has printed lots of money and appropriated all of society's wealth for him/herself, but with all his/her glory, he/she is not satisfied. There is something more than the material that needs fulfilment that profit and wealth cannot satisfy. And this hunger is only corrupted by the fulfilment of power, the need for control. Heeding a word of advice that absolute power corrupts absolutely, exploitation inflates the individual's ego to indulge in subjective desire and the social structure is thickened with arbitrary impositions. Exploitation is organisation according to differences of unequal functions. The struggle is the organisation of production and market maintenance. It has nothing to do with personal humiliations or psychological abuse, or racism and discrimination. It has nothing to do invasion and war but that's the nature of humanity induced by power.
The modern form of exploitation or struggles in the maintenance of the market for both the capitalist and worker or the private and public sector to share in the profit is a monetary economic system. Deficits for example usually are the result of spending more than earning requiring loans to prompt growth. But loans increase interest rates on the cost of food and services and where unemployment is rife, income is far less than expenses. Inflation has thus kicked into motion struggles of unequal values and functions to impact the social consequences. Obviously in the modern, the social organisation of the economy is characterised by active protests and discriminations against migrants as nationalism raises an ugly head in the struggle for resources.
The generation of social relations promotes propaganda by fear mongering and psychological coercion of consumers is where the media plays a powerful role. But the only people who seem to be scared are investors. Who are the people managing investments and are they themselves sanctioned by any absolute standard as to the information they handle, I don't know but there's a lot of movement going on out there as if the market has assumed a cunning mentality and has emerged a subjective entity.
And the conditions also foster human development of the material kind. The imposition of arbitration in social policies and promotion of material economic stimulus have indoctrinated and reinforced subjective behaviour especially among the gullible population. The consequences have proven counter-productive when greater than the intended outcome. This is added to the failure of economies which are based in linear developments and functions. Germany's social policies in the early stage of the Great Recession targeted the private sector to hire and necessarily establishing the local market. All other countries of the West took IMF advice to follow social reformations of direct funding of business while public spending severed. In the middle of the recession, Germany and China are producing growth during a time when Western economies are feeding a spiralling trend.
Amidst the rubble of failure, something new emerges to restore the living once again. It is when human has arrived at a dead end that a spirit is born but would a new system emerge from the rubble of the modern monetary economy maybe, but it's sure to provide human with another opportunity to succeed in his/her struggles to achieve selfish ambitious desire once more.
My Social Relations has established a solid correlation in material developments contributing to the stability of social progress. As the objective begins to fade whether by corruption or erosion, the means of sustaining reality corrode in value and the material strips away. When erosion corrodes functional elements, soon they cease to function and the organisation implodes. This abnormal human development inherent of material progress is indiscriminate of culture, of belief, or politics, and gender or status.
If beauty transcends material aspects to objective being, then attraction demands quality produced by the practice of principles. The absolute strand secures production by sustaining an objective purpose in the organisation of the economy. It is society.