Culture
Research is a useful tool to highlight a political point of view. It is more often designed to achieve the desired outcome. Statistics are numbers also accumulated and interpreted by someone. The private sector mainstream corporate media's recent polls have consistently returned favourable results for the private sector government and negative results for the opposition. In light of recent economic performance and their social consequences, one has to doubt those results and question the integrity of those involved and their professionalism. Again, the principle is not determined by a number, or by popular opinions and or by a majority. It only violates democratic and political rights.
If we can remember the Italian Prime Minister, he came into office with a majority based on popular opinions behind his media corporation. The recent media debacle in the UK also adds subjective decisions behind media promotions. In fact most governments promoted by the media have a temporary used by date in office when sooner or later citizens would be informed but by then it is usually too late to save the country from a downturn.
It is setting the standards by an authentic system of understanding culture and its sub layers the behaviour and social relations of participants. There are many reasons given for the static nature of the global economy but I have put it down to culture. It is culture spearheading divisions causing the disestablishment of social institutions and economic uncertainties. But reflective of culture in the modern political sense merely provides euphemism for racial tribes. It is a convenient platform underlying political motivation to the influence of economic and social decisions. Contrast to popular belief, culture has and will continue to influence the pure principle of belief.
I claimed that culture is the idea consisting of feelings and senses associated with symbolic meanings representing a people. These meanings derived from tribal habits and customs and are often captured in symbols of arts, crafts, and entertainment as well as talents and skills. Some have made careers of classification the artifacts and abstract symbols of time representations of who we are and where we come from. It is politics of culture which also remind us of what we have done to mark the course of history.
I have summed up the above process of culture in the objective representation. Tribal or racial customs and habits have served to accumulate experience as we make sense of our existence. We have come a long way in making choices and participation in productive activities upholding the health, welfare and wellbeing of society. But often we fall back to the subjective nature of race and tribalism to indulge in abstract and symbols of our self. If you care to notice I have associated the subjective nature of race and tribalism with the self, and culture of society with being. It distinguishes a process of making sense and understanding ourselves which enables us to move forward from mere victim survivals of a hierarchical regime.
When the economy is proficient and social relations moderate, the majority culture claims success. When the economy is inadequate and social relations extreme, the minority gets the blame. And social relations reflect the subjective nature of race and tribal (self) as backward but objective (principle) achievements of society as forward. You don't need to do a rocket scientist research to conclude that, we are all experiencing the social consequences of economic downturn as we speak the result of economic management by those cultural appointments.
Progress is now a forward movement from racial and tribal organisations to cultural organisations. And at the same time, its accumulated knowledge from experience advances civil progress upward. The former associates with the self, and the latter is the gradual development of objective principles. We are moving from the dominant rule of tribal hierarchies of the past to democratic organisation of society in the modern. The trouble is we keep on falling back to the racial tribe every time we indulge in the self and its subjective nature. And this is prominent in political decisions affecting our civil progress hopefully to somewhere in the future. But there is a good chance that we have taken the wrong turn somewhere in the past, and now heading backwards smartly.
The objective nature of being is an advanced form of existence but the means by which we sustain our existence is undergoing a subtle development of duplicating ourselves. When these virtual copies become fully automated, we would learn from them what life should be all about. And by technological indoctrination, we make a full 360o turn, back to tribal self. I'd like to think that we have made a wrong turn in the past by over developing the self in the hope of economic proficiency and prosperity. But now we know that it has only led to the rapid depletion of resources to the destruction of our world and as subjective behaviour accumulate expensive consequences. Human beings in the principle development are once again overwhelmed by the material self construct.
It's like creation from observation of nature. The prototype is automated and human learns from the robot how his/her life should be. The robot takes over the working force and disestablishes society as it deprives the opportunity for humanity to exercise their natural abilities. It deprives him/her from freedoms and rights to choose. And one wonders if it's a strategy to subjugate a class of people for structural purposes. And since class is stratified along cultural lines, then it is subjective materialism of tribalism and race.
The objective nature on the other hand is absolute existent from nothingness to being. Obviously, life begins from the pure principle and maintains its absolute nature in the holistic existence of the here and now. In this purified form, we are human beings. Human beings exist irrespective of culture, gender, or class stratification of tribes. The pure principle is absolute, holistic, inalienable right and universal. And from the bottom up we have races, tribes, individuals and their division of sub cultures.
When we are human beings first and foremost, we are in fact maintaining objective meanings and purpose of our subjective nature. We are different in self of gender, race, and tribe, but we are all the same in beings of human. Self is a material construct, being is the quantification of the principle sustained by the material. Self (body), being (mind), and pure principle (spirit) makes up the totality of our holistic existence. We make choices to live in separate worlds but instead of moving forward and upward, we move backward into the self and downward to tribal hierarchy. It is when we dissociate self, being, and principle from tribal race and culture that we might be able to live in multi diverse organisations. Racism and tribalism is backward movement as culture advances unique experience into the future. The material subjective nature of tribal race is replaced by its modern form of technology. I think we can live side by side with virtual duplicates among humans than with tribal barbarians and terrorism of ancient tribes.
Now, recalling the definition of culture as the objective transcendence of the material self, it follows therefore that when all cultures live side by side, it is in fact one culture of all human beings. Multiculture was once referred to coexistent as we participate in share activities of society, but since culture is inherent of the subjective nature of tribal hierarchy we are going back to social unrest and uncertainty. So rather than going back to tribal race, we are already celebrating diversity in symbolic representations of our feelings and senses making up ourselves in the arts and their productive outcomes sustaining our being. Tribalism or racism is backward that doesn't exist in the world of being.