POVERTY

Poverty is inherent of the class system where there will always be the rich at the one end and the poor at the other. The class system is based on struggles of inequalities, and its ideological motivation has somewhat erected class boundaries between the races. The maintenance of poverty is the maintenance of struggles, or racial boundaries, or the status quo and reinforced by political, social, and economic decisions such as social policies targeting the redirection of revenues to the rich while low income families are excluded. For example, class attitudes towards minority ethnic groups and low income families such as institutionalised racism ie; first - come - last serve, systemic maintenance of socialist consumerism where the poor endure forms of ailments including psychological conditions as a means to redirect revenues to an elite class of professionals. Doctors, psychologists, lawyers, social workers and other authoritative figureheads ride the Child Abuse and Domestic Violence wagon to uphold a socialist economic system earning the government billions on the day while the so-called professionals enjoy the improvement in their lifestyles.

Poverty is thus a deep rooted basis of the system in place. It is forced into the mind, it is the struggle of the heart it is physically and emotionally integrated. It is common practice that to improve the lot of the people in poverty is to raise the wealth of the rich, and the crumbs that fall off their plates shall improve the lot of the poor. This is what they refer to as Relative Poverty, when the poor's lot is based on the GDP rate of the population of each country. But the modern system of consumerism and monetary management has in fact increased the gap between the poor and the rich. The poor is seemed to be involved in many benefits but in their reality, the consumer mentality involves with such economic activities as loans, hire purchases, doctors fees, therapies and medication charges, lawyers' fees, fines as well as the increased in electricity charges, school fees, phone charges, and so on.

The emotional burden of the pressure from the administration of debt arrears, rent, maintenance and repairs, courts, lawyers, bureaucrats and so on, is overwhelming and has been the major cause of child abuse and family violence. No one in their right minds would hurt their loved ones, and many reactions committed under pressure and stress or impulse are not deliberate. If the so-called 'do gooders' are serious about resolving Child Abuse and Family Violence, they should come down from their high horses to understand the basis of reality.

Simply to stop Child Abuse and Family Violence is to remove poverty and you are looking at equality. But we all know that the destruction of the foundation of the class system is also economic destruction. It is therefore systemically necessary and socially obliged to ensure that poverty is not destroying the souls who are supporting the bottom end of the system. Sustaining poverty as part of the system is not choking them to accumulate in prisons or hospitals and homes, because it has also been proven as uneconomic in terms of infrastructure and human resources. The socialist consumerism under the Freemarket is basically incompatible. Instead, efforts should be redirected to earning a living that sustains the worker, and to generate activities towards the maintenance of social relations of the economy. Labour and manufacturing of objective goods that are contributed to the maintenance of society can prove economic and sufficient to sustain a relative quality of living among the classes.

It requires the radical reformation of social organisations including the Media and Education in the renewal of the mind away from the material self construct domination to a more useful purpose. It is particularly necessary as natural trends have already picked up on the effects of climate change and the recent economic collapse.

The class system is not based on equality and diversity, and so called social, political and economic policies are further distancing the gap between the rich and poor. In the so-called age of the modern and technological advantages, the rich are enjoying the success of new medical therapies and luxurious development while the poor are subjects of experimentation to improve a drug therapy or genetic treatment for a pharmaceutical company.

THE SOCIALIST INDUSTRY IS BIG BUSINESS

Your Socialist front is now operating in full force. Its industry is based in the heart of the family targeting parents in relation to their children. The Anti Smacking Law is now making a profit for so-called charitable organisation, as another bill is passed to further charge and convict parents for their children's truancy. 'The Secretary of Education has become the prosecutor of parents of school age children and has raised fines for parents from $150 to $300 for failing to ensure their child goes to school and for a second offence is being raised from $400 to $3000 - Stuff News 13 Dec 08'. It is known that some 30,000 students skip schools on any day and since it is a common problem students and parents are most likely to be second time offenders. That’s $3000 x 30,000 and the family is extracted of $900,000,000, the government pockets revenues of one trillion dollars on any day. That's BIG BUSINESS!

The Anti Smacking Law has already earned a profit of over three million dollars a year. But this is set to increase with pending modifications to be introduced next year. Like the Anti Smacking Law subtlety, it targets subjective aspects as reported by the Stuff News 13 Dec 08; 'neglect of child under 14 years old, threats by the offender to prevent the victim reporting an offence, serious or long-term physical or psychological effects of the offending on the victim and the magnitude of the breach of any relationship of trust between the victim and offender'. Sounds like Helen and Sue reincarnations...

It's interesting how that word 'trust' is mentioned in there. Is the government now playing a moral role in family relationships like a Sunday School teacher knuckling down hypocrisy, but this proposal promises to also increase the number of potential victims as claimants run rampant the opportunities for an easy claim on any old ailment including a headache. It's yet another nail on the family's coffin in the face of all those conservative followers who hoped for a change. I can't wait what's to become of the unemployed, the sickness, the invalids, and single parents!

These social troubles are common and can be resolved by natural means of therapy and rehabilitation, but Socialism is in for the profit at the family's expense. The socialist industry has established its roots in the community prompting a professional class while parents and their children descend to join the criminal sector.

So, what will happen to family members if they fail to pay the fines? What will happen to the children if parents are locked up behind bars because they can't afford the fines? Will this be the renewal of the homeless children and street cultures and its institutional indoctrination of consumer behaviour? Will there be an urgent need to push for an Euthanasia law?

I think this socialist road is preferred because it oppresses a lot of poor people usually based on their ethnicity. That's true conservative class maintenance, but this road has been travelled many times before with known long term consequences on the overall economy and its social organisation. It means that there are no tangible products to generate values for both social and monetary. It is another version of abstract monetary policies which departed from the real economy and soon left floating without a solid foundation. But it has the potentials to develop extreme behaviour on both fronts; the oppressor and the oppressed.

In a time where the choices are rich in changing behaviour embracing the milieu of opportunities from climate change to smart consumerism, this government takes a giant leap back to the tribal boundaries of its origin. It terminated the baby in bio developments and manufacturing to play a moral role from the pulpit of arbitration.

SOCIALIST INDUSTRIAL BOOM

The NZ Herald Friday 12 Dec 08 has highlighted a natural relationship between parent and child a conflict in the face of the Anti Smacking Law. And to gloss it over, care giving Charities are making millions in the year.

Caregivers admit that children love their parents even in crisis and separation. "It's because they love them - that's their parent," said northern region spokeswoman Jenny Corry. "They are the most difficult to shift in terms of their thinking."

What does she mean by the most difficult to shift in their thinking? It is parents' fears that their children are brainwashed and poisoned against them in the process of indoctrinating new roles and separation of the children from their parents.

The caregiver agency then receives either funding for its programme, or charges the parents for a fee of $1200 per child. That's 2680 children to the year at $3,216,000; that's three million in case you missed it. This has somewhat blemished the value of Charity in the disguised of a socialist industry.

Discipline is a natural instinct and a necessary duty; all animals do it to train their offspring for survival but for human to be responsible members of society. The cause of child abuse is also confirmed by the same article that parents require budgeting skills and to learn how to cope under such pressure especially during periods of economic depression.

When you are born into a family of a mother and father, nothing in the world can change that. Your culture and your genetic inheritance from your parents are in the blood relation. When this bond is twisted, nothing the so-called care givers can do to prevent individuals making a mess of themselves. Some children leave these so called safe homes to begin a life of turmoil always wearing the identity of victim and become depended for life. While they endure personal struggles, the socialist system maintains the means of its production. Your pain is someone else's gain, the prompts of a socialist structure.

Discipline is a natural duty and child abuse is related to the economic determination of behaviour. The mode of thinking is overwhelmed by material desires and its aspirations during times of hardship, but without support even the strongest parents have failed the challenging circumstances. They are only humans.

And yet their subjugation to circumstances beyond their control is regulated a reason in the Anti Smacking Law to separate parents from their children. Their children are captured in social institutions to indoctrinate as future economic subjects, the means of production for a socialist industry.

The facts speak for themselves; the increase of child abuse is a reflection of economic downturns and inflation. During these times, prisons are over-populated, and waiting queues for a place in rehabilitation centres and hospitals are culled.

Where is the right of the parent and their children to the basic needs of life, the quality of living, to access to equal justice and fair representation, and the right not to subject to torture, experimentation, brainwashed, and compensation for their loss under circumstances controlled by the state?

If we don't have a choice for example of cultural and traditional intervention that are independent from the socialist agenda and where we can naturally heal our families, then the ugly head of Socialism has made slaves of the means of production.

A Liberal socialist system is the dark cloud hovering upon human civilisation.

Herald Article

Related Child Abuse

THE FAMILY

The Family is the cornerstone of the community. It is based on principles of marriage uniting the husband and wife. The father is the cohesive authority, and the mother is honoured. If each household is founded on such principle values, then the whole of the community is related in extended family ties. The nation is an extended family.

It is not only the basis of principle values, the family is also organised around the material means for its upkeep. Members prepare themselves for lifetime careers bringing home the bacon. As the means of production change from one mode to another, social changes transform the roles family members acquire. From Agricultural to Manufacturing, family members left the family to find work. In the age of Technological developments and Services, the father role of provider is challenged when work seems to be more suitable for women and the family undergoes a period of role reversal.

Parallel to principle values and economic functions, Politics is the dominant force in the shaping of struggles. Socialist Liberals thought to have freed women and children from traditional roles, only to capture the low income family in structural maintenance. The middle class woman found her freedom and left the family to pursue her career, while children are basically brought up by third parties in childcare industries. Other family members acquired new roles and subsequently a civil union is born. The family moved from the base of economic functions to the heart of socialist developments, the father is either left in the home or left the family unit. Same sex units emerge as the socialisation of homosexual and lesbian orientation rides the propaganda wave.

The traditional values upon which the family is based are replaced by the material aspects of economic maintenance. The erosion of the psyche from its principle identity to a material self construct traces the social movement associated with a specific economic mode of a time. These are experienced in momentous events in the lives of family members recorded in their DNA and often passed down the line in defective genes. Social behaviour can be traced by their economic trends, and political struggles of a time.

And if you open up an era and tap into the lives of some of the families, struggles are very real and extreme. In the modern where parents have totally surrendered their authority to Socialist Liberals, the middle income families have become beneficiaries of political bargaining, the lower income families on the other hand are excluded and deprived from access to the means of improving their lot. The lack of income has limited the shopping to cheaper foods, most of which are lacking in nutritional values. The restricted budget also means poor housing, poor health, and enduring a form of disease. The deficiency in the budget has caused some individuals to find creative ways of making ends meet. Obviously, these folks make up the queues in court hearings, hospital queues, prison population, and unemployment. Their availability has become a sector for political opportunism and for the middle class to blame their frustrations during periods of economic depression. Noticeably, their membership identification is just as ethnic as their low incomes.

The Socialist capture ranges from youth gangs, alcohol and drug addiction, suicide, sexual violence, extreme violence, and obviously family separation. Not only women are preferred in the technological developments for their smaller hands and nimble fingers as Asians according to one Member of Parliament, but are also considered over men in running health care clinics, homes, counselling and rehabilitation, and of course childcare.

The Liberal Socialist movement has contaminated the psyche by material developments which has locked the direction of social trends on self destruction. We are not only losing our faculties, but we are also unable to stabilise the changing nature of the family. It seems more children are born out of family units while the family in itself is breaking apart.

CRIMINAL CLASS

Many young men who are leaving school without qualifications end up on the streets. The attraction of an alternative lifestyle and peer pressure takes over, and the rate of violence and crime is increased. Yet social policies not only promote their material freedom to engage in violent and criminal activities, it contributes to their class foundation. This sector of poverty, violence and crime is established at the bottom of the hill.

If political leaders are serious about dealing with the problem, they would direct their intervention not at the foot of the hill, but at early education, and student preparation for work before leaving school. Surely for those who have found themselves idle after leaving school could benefit from such a project as an employment scheme, but instead they are locked up in prison.

All political parties agree to increase the police force and build more prisons. But before then there's a victims' class besides the professionals including lawyers and psychologists among counsellors, social workers, and caregivers. You see, the availability of a sector of poverty has made it necessary to redirect revenues from helping those in need to those providing professional services.

Socialism is the process of exploitation our humanity especially for those in need to profit those who are already well off, the consequences of which forms the basis of class; the poverty class prompting the professional class or the poor becoming the means of which the rich lifestyle is sustained.

And this process is also at work at the biotechnological level of existence. It is mentioned in various media reports that babies are been tested for culprit genes to identify future criminals. Your child will never be the same in your eyes anymore, and what chances he/she has in life is already determined by a blood test at birth. This test is supposed to provide scientific evidence in a spin of a scandalous proposition. The so-called culprit gene is a by product of living in poverty conditions for long periods of time. It suggests that the babies' forbearers have themselves lived in poverty for a while restricting their diet to the scarcity of the impoverished environment lacking in protein and healthy nutrition.

You can certainly imagine that a criminal baby is the key to open Pandora's Box following all sorts of chemical mixes to prevent him/her from inevitably groing up to become a freak I mean a criminal. Will we have babies growing up to spend all their lives in a cocoon and never having to leave home because of this criminal label? The thought of this kind leaves a creepy image on the mention of a doctor's visit.

Because one is poor, he/she cannot afford to obtain a higher form of education for him/herself or for his/her children. But the lack of brain development from the lack of protein and nutritional diet means that he/she may not be able to cope in long hours at school taking in the abstract nature of learning. And so the cycle of poverty is in the blood and our way of thinking, it's in the environment and political decision making.

Class formation is maintained in South Auckland by a number of methods. The divide- and-rule strategy is more apparent especially in Mangere where the Pacific Islands population held the biggest majority in a political representation when Taito Philip Field was a Labour minister. Now there are half a dozen Pacific Islanders representatives vying for the electorate from various parties and the electorate is diversified into fragments of ethnic isolation, status groups, and religious following. They share a common membership of a class of poverty.

What can you do when living in poverty but depend on state hand out for housing, health and education; our sector is determined by what is dished out rather than by what we can do as individuals. How much can we do when we are poor and helpless, we are cut down before we can attempt to make a statement. How can we cope with our condition if the frustrations of the working class or middle income families are dumped upon our already burdened under-developed minds and over-developed physiques? Yes when we don't have enough for the shopping we tend to eat a lot of cheaper food, the food most likely to lack protein and nutritional value. And there we have no brain power to work out our problems or carrier cells to metabolise our activities, so we become obese.

This is not the only article written about the topic and certainly not the only one written by me and not without a suggestion to a resolution. Under Socialism, Poverty is a class factor. We either have to give up and become comfortable with being labelled criminals for the rest of our lives, or we can die trying to be responsible even in our short lives.

We don&'t have an effective political leadership. We have many aspirations but we are subjected to the status quo and its maintenance of our poverty. Our children are born in poverty and will grow up in poverty to have their children in poverty. We are not effective against media promotion and peer pressure in the influence of our children away from crime. And policies seem to support the formation of a super class by maintaining our poverty.

Obviously, our number is a factor in political representation and we may struggle to form a direct representative. It is therefore necessary to ally with a similar party which shares the same concerns and one which will take us seriously. Our priority must be placed on our diet, our activities and aspirations to ensure healthy genes are passed down the line. Our focus is centred on new births and to place a village watch on every child to secure him/her from malnutrition, from harm, and from exposure or contamination to material addiction not just for food but also for behaviour. I am not arguing to regulate the family and the community, but more focus on the consequences of production such as censors on videos, films, and games, as well as some control on the availability of alcohol and drugs or mind altering substances.

The question is, can we be trusted to help ourselves move away from poverty and become responsible if those in authority are only interested in their own class status? We certainly have a huge obstacle in the way of our wellbeing requiring extraordinary efforts to overcome.

The privatisation of prisons may offer services to overseas providers, but competitions will seek to also provide continuous education, work skills, and drug rehabilitation for prisoners. Prison institutions will compete with healthcare and education providers for government funding. It makes sense for clients and consumers that those classified as patients remain on the sickness benefit while undergoing rehabilitation treatments in a hospital, while in prison will save the government millions because prisoners are not on any kind of benefits.

It makes sense that all these school leavers will catch up with their education and rehabilitation treatment in prisons. And since mothers are now locked up with their babies too by the Greens intervention, the whole poor class education, healthcare, housing, and Kohanga Reo or Kindergarten are now established in prison. The University of Life!

And of course it provides a plausible explanation for not taking up a work scheme for the unemployed in targeted areas.